Piché or Picher or Pichet or Pichie
Maureen Pichie
Pierre dit Lamusette Piché and Anne Pinot
Pierre dit Lamusette Piché
Born around 1686 France
Died ………………………………………..
Parents: unknown
Married in France
Anne Pinot
Born around 1594 France
Died ………………………………..
Parents: unknown
Child
Pierre dit Lamusette Piché
Pierre Piché dit Lamusette (1636-1713)
Chronicle in collaboration with the l’Outaouais Genealogical Society, Inc., published January 27, 1992
Pierre Picher said Lamusette: bigamist unknowingly
Pierre = Peter in English
The Piché of America are not from a single ancestor since two holders of this surname let themselves be conquered in the seventeenth century by the idea of trying their luck in this land of opportunity that was New France. The two, even if they were from the same region, Poitou, were unrelated. Their names were Pierre and Jean Picher said Lamusette Pégin said Pichet.
Let us focus now on the first born in Faye-la-Vineuse August 18, 1632, son of Pierre and Anne Piant (Piaut, Pinot) he married Marie Lefebvre in his native region. Preferring to acclimate to his new adopted land before bringing his wife is one that Peter embarks on a sailboat to Quebec.
In 1662 it is found in the lordship of Sillery, in Québec, initiating the work of the earth, even if hatter's trade. Having learned of his brother Louis the death of his wife remained in France, Peter befriends Catherine Durant, girl newly landed King in the colony, and the bride 25 November 1665.
New France 1700
A year later, the young pioneer rents a concession for three years at St. Michael coast, still in the lordship of Sillery and settled there with his wife and his first son, John the Baptist. In 1668, a second son was born. The lease ended and convinced that it is more profitable to clear his own land and seed, Pierre bought a concession of two acres forty depth to the lordship of Dombourg; this is where the other six children born to the couple.
The year 1671 subject to Picher family had very bad news. Indeed, Pierre learns of a newly arrived fellow Marie Lefebvre from France, his first wife he thought dead, is alive and well. He decides not see none other than Bishop François Monrency de Laval. The latter being just about to leave for the mother country, promises to give him the news. Upon his return, the bishop of Quebec confirms the incredible news to Pierre and advised him to go to France to fetch his wife.
But, fortunately for him, unfortunately for her, Marie can not bear the long journey crossing at sea. Declared bigamist two years earlier, Peter went back to Quebec without wife, His first union was broken by the death of Marie Lefebvre the second was canceled for being contracted while Mary was still alive. During his marriage to Catherine was then rehabilitated. In November 1707, they buy their new home in the lordship of Boucherville. Peter died in 1713.
Second generation
Pierre dit Lamusette Piché and Catherine Durand
Pierre dit Lamusette Piché
Born August 18, 1632, St-Georges de Faye-la-Vineuse, Chinon, Poitiers, France
Died: October 31, 1713 St-Sulpice, Québec
Parents: Pierre dit Lamusette Piché and Anne Pinot
Married November 25, 1665 Québec
Catherine Durand
Born about 1649
Died June 06 1717 St-Sulpice, Québec.
Parents: Pierre Durand and Jacquette Courtois
Children
Jean-Baptiste Piché, Adrien Piché, Marie-Madeleine Piché,
Pierre dit Dupré Piché, Catherine Piché, François Piché,
Ignace-Joseph Piché, Louis Piché
Pierre Piché said Lamusette was born around 1636 in Saint-Georges, Faye-la-Vineuse, Chinon, Indre-et-Loire, France. He married Marie Lefebvre before 1665 in France. Pierre Piché said Lamusette confirmed October 15, 1665 at Notre Dame, Québec, Québec, Québec, Québec.
Catherine Durand and Pierre Piché said Lamusette sign a marriage contract November 23, 1665 in front of Michel Fillion. He married Catherine Durand daughter of Jacquette Courtois and Pierre Durand November 25, 1665 at Notre Dame, Québec, Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, Canada.
Pierre Piché said Lamusette hatter and is living in 1666 at Our Lady of the Angels, St. Charles River or Charlesbourg, Capitale-Nationale. Pierre Piché said Lamusette and Catherine Durand resident at Our Lady of the Angels, St. Charles River or Charlesbourg in 1666. Jean-Baptiste Piché, Catherine Durand and Pierre Piché said Lamusette resident coast of St. Genevieve, St. Francis or Saint-Michel, Quebec in 1667.
Pierre Piché said Lamusette has twelve acres of land value in 1667. The Catherine Durand marriage contract and Pierre Piché said Lamusette is canceled married in 1671. First in France, he learns of his brother Louis, three months after his arrival that his wife has died; remarried, he learns that she is still alive in 1671. Pierre Piché said Lamusette hand for his wife in France in 1671. The marriage of Catherine Durand and Pierre Piché said Lamusette is réhablité September 9, 1673.
Pierre Piché said Lamusette is chartrier in 1681 to the lordship of Dombour Neuville, Capitale-Nationale. Stone Jug, Pitcher Adrien, Jean-Baptiste Piché, Marie-Catherine Piché, Catherine Durand and Pierre Piché said Lamusette resident in the lordship of Dombour Neuville in 1681. Pierre Piché said Lamusette has two cows and ten acres of land value 1681. He was buried October 31, 1713 in Saint-Sulpice, Lanaudière, Quebec
Third generation
Pierre dit Dupre Piché and Anne Sylvestre
Pierre dit Dupré Piché
Born July 11, 1674 Neuville, Portneuf Québec
Died : August 12 1712 Cap-Santé, Québec
Parents : Pierre dit Lamusette Piché and Catherine Durand
Married November 14 1697, Neuville Québec
Anne Sylvestre
Born October 23, 1678 Neuville, Portneuf, Québec
Died ..................................
Parents : Nicolas dit Champagne Sylvestre and Barbe Neveu
Children
Marie-Angélique Piché, François dit Dupré Piché, Pierre Piché,
Marie-Anne Piché, Marie-Madeleine Piché,
Marie Thérèse Piché, Marie Catherine Piché, Marie-Josephe Piché
Other marriage of Anne Sylvestre with François Biron
Filles du Roi
Filles du Roy – Daughters of the King
At this time the colonists rarely bathe, believing a bath would cause colic, headaches and vertigo. This European tradition usually resulted in a May bath with a June weddings before they started to smell too bad. The brides carried a bouquet of flowers to hid the body odor. Both male and female wore sachets of dried flowers for the same purpose. The natives bathed fairly often and couldn't understand this strange practice of the French. Some said you could smell an European before you could see him. The savages had another custom to washing themselves before a meal, with the notion that, if they failed to do so, they would transgress rules absolutely necessary for obtaining success in hunting. The savages reasoned if they smelled the animals would smell them and spoil the hunt.
The French court was told most of the Quebec population was mainly unmarried males, many of whom interbred freely with the savages, wasting their seed among the pagans, instead of increasing the strength of the colony. Most of these Métis offspring are absorbed into the Indian population and are not recorded in the French records. This situation led to the Filles du Roi program of sending orphan girls, daughters of debtors, streetwalkers and runaway wives to New France. Only fifteen out of the first 150 could not find husbands and ended up in domestic service.
The Black Code
Maryland passed the "black code" which declared that any Negro in the colony was a slave for life by virtue of his color. This conflicted with Church doctrine that stated only pagans could be enslaved and must be released when baptized. Practice differed from principle when it suited the situation.
The Jesuit Bishop, Father Francois-Exavier de Laval Montmorency (1623-1708), established tithe to the church of Canada at 1/20 of the labor of men (cultivation of the soil), but the fur trade is naturally excluded.
The New France Colony begs France to send an army to deal with the Iroquois who now control the St. Lawrence River system. The King agrees that the Iroquois must be exterminated.
The Money card
The denier tournois along with the copper double liard, the denier was one of the predominant coins in circulation in New France up to the 1660's. The denier, although rated at 1 denier in France, circulated as a 2 denier piece in New France.
The merchants saw a chance for a quick profit and imported these coins in large quantities. This resulted in an over supply prompting the government of Quebec to ban the denier altogether in 1664. The Order of the Sovereign Council which demonetized the denier allowed the double tournois to remain in circulation but reduced its value to 1 denier to curb its excessive importation. It had formally circulated at 4 deniers in New France. The liard had circulated as a 6 deniar coin and this was devalued to a 2 denier coin to discourage its excessive importation
Forth generation
François dit Dupré Piché and Marie-Françoise Blanchet
François dit Dupré Piché
Born May 17, 1700 Rivière-Ouelle, Kamousraska
Died .................................................
Parents: Pierre dit Dupre Piché and Anne Sylvestre
Married November 08 1723 St-Ours sur le Richelieu, Québec
Angélique dit Saint-Georges Laporte
Born March 01 1704 Contrecoeur, Québec
Died: September 22, 1726 Saint-Ours sur le Richelieu, Québec
Parents: Louis Laporte and Madeleine Massot
Child
François dit Dupré Piché
Other marriage of François says Dupré Piché with Marie-Françoise Blanchet in St-Sulpice, Québec
The money cards Part one
NORTH AMERICA'S FIRST EXPERIENCE WITH
PAPER MONEY: CARD MONEY IN NEW FRANCE
Everybody knows that New Orleans was founded by the French. But the area where we stand in Alabama also used to be part of the French North American empire in the 18th century. Not far from here, north of Montgomery, was a military fort called Fort Toulouse. The French controlled one third of the continent at the time.
The reason why I have to deliver this presentation in English today, however, is of course that the French lost most of their empire in 1763, at the end of the Seven Years' War – or what Americans call the French and Indian War.
The French were great explorers but, as the saying goes, their empire was a giant with clay feet. Although France was by far the largest country in Europe – it had 20 million inhabitants in 1700, compared with six million for England and Wales – it sent very few settlers across the Atlantic. Most of the ten million or so French Canadians who live in Canada and the U.S. today are descendants of only some ten thousand settlers who stayed on this continent.
Huguenots were forbidden to settle in the colony and hundreds of thousands went elsewhere in Europe and North America instead. But the main reason why so few Frenchmen crossed the Atlantic is that there was not much to do in Canada – not because of the weather, to which colonists quickly adapted, but because of the abysmally stupid French economic policy.
Mercantilism was of course the official doctrine in France, just like in England. The colony was seen as a source of raw materials for the benefit of the mother country. The fur trade with the Indians was its main economic activity. This could have allowed colonists to accumulate some capital to develop other activities. But during most of the period, it was in the hands of a monopoly, and profits went to France instead of being reinvested in Canada.
There weren't many opportunities for investments anyway. There was very little that could be profitably produced in Canada. Apart from small-scale crafts, manufacturing was forbidden when it would bring competition to metropolitan producers. The prices of various goods were controlled. And silliest of all, trade with the neighbours – the English colonies to the south – was forbidden, although contraband was widespread.
One thing the French managed particularly badly was money. Until the 1660s, when there were still only about 3,000 French settlers in the St. Lawrence Valley, economic exchange in the colony took place primarily by barter. Beaver pelts constituted the most commonly traded commodity, but other types of pelts, as well as liquor, served as alternative media of exchange. Religious orders brought some money to the colony, and once a year, the King would send a large sum to pay for the administration and the soldiers stationed in the colony. Most of that money was paid to metropolitan merchants for imported goods and brought back to France. 
The government started manipulating the money in 1661, by ordaining that the value of currencies circulating in Canada should be 25% higher than their nominal values in France. This was designed to induce currency imports, favour the monetization of economic exchange and integrate colonial economic activity with that of the mother country. But of course the revaluation had its perverse effects. It led to an inflow of poor quality French coins containing a large proportion of copper, while merchants only accepted gold and silver coins as payment. By most accounts, the price level in Canada gradually increased to accommodate the revaluation so that the purchasing power of metropolitan currency was unchanged in the long run.
In his History of Money and Banking in the United States, Murray Rothbard writes that apart from medieval China, the world had never seen government paper money until the colonial government of Massachusetts emitted a fiat paper issue in 1690. In a footnote however, he explains that the only exception was a curious form of paper money issued five years earlier in Quebec, which became known as "card money."
Playing Card Money
1685-1728 (front) Playing Card Money
1685-1728 (back)
You won't be surprised to learn that war and protectionism had something to do with the appearance of paper money, in both New France and Massachusetts. To simplify a bit, the two empires were then vying for control of the Great Lakes area, which at the time was the new frontier of the fur trade. The Dutch and English merchants in Albany, New York, were able to offer a higher price than the French for the pelts and were attracting some of the Indian allies of the French, as well as French adventurers who were selling fur in contraband. They were also arming their Iroquois allies and encouraging them to attack French parties and their Indian allies.
The French were constantly at war with the Iroquois. In 1684, new soldiers had arrived from France for another campaign against them. However, in the fall of that year, the annual appropriations failed to arrive. The intendant of the colony, Jacques de Meulles, had no funds to pay colonial officials and troops. (The intendant was what could be called the top bureaucrat in the colony, second only to the governor who represented the king.)
In June 1685, he decided to issue his own credit notes. Because good paper was rare, he collected the playing cards in the colony and, with his seal and signature, issued them in various denominations as paper money. By an ordinance, the cards became legal tender and merchants had to accept them.
“It is perhaps just a coincidence, but it is certainly fitting that inflationary paper money, which is often called ‘funny money,’ appeared on this continent as playing cards with a bureaucrat's signature on them.”
It is perhaps just a coincidence, but it is certainly fitting that inflationary paper money, which is often called "funny money," appeared on this continent as playing cards with a bureaucrat's signature on them. At first however, the issue of card money was not inflationary.
The cards were backed by funds that were supposed to arrive from France, and were fully redeemed when those funds arrived. From the point of view of the authorities, they also had the advantage of being worth nothing to New Yorkers and New Englanders. They could not be used for trade and did not contribute to any outflow of currency – trade and currency outflow of course being bad from a mercantilist perspective.
Five years later, the French and the English were again at war with each others. In 1689, during the Glorious Revolution, William of Orange had acceded to the English throne, and James II had fled to France. In North America, there were raiding parties on both sides of the border and major invasion plans were drawn up. A French plan to invade the city of New York and deport its population never materialized. But in the summer of 1690, a flotilla of 32 ships with 2000 men left Boston, while 2500 English soldiers and Indian fighters left on foot to invade the St. Lawrence Valley. Fortunately for my ancestors, bad weather, luck and an epidemic of smallpox among the troops saved New France.
The English had to return to Boston without any booty. Soldiers were grumbling for their pay and there was fear of a mutiny. The Massachusetts government tried without success to borrow from Boston merchants. In December 1690, it decided to print £7,000 pounds in paper notes and, as Rothbard explains, pledged "that it would redeem them in gold or silver out of tax revenue in a few years and that absolutely no further paper notes would be issued. Characteristically, however, both parts of the pledge went quickly by the board: The issue limit disappeared in a few months, and all the bills continued unredeemed for nearly 40 years." Massachusetts would again issue massive amounts of paper money after another failed expedition against Quebec in 1711.
As might be expected, in Canada too, the intendant got into the habit of issuing card money. As confidence in the new money grew, the population began to regard it as a stable asset and to retain a proportion instead of redeeming their entire holdings every year. But instead of keeping currency reserves to cover the card money still in circulation, colonial authorities increased their spending. They also started to issue card money in excess of the French government's annual appropriation. The cards were very useful but prices started increasing as people realized that there were more and more of them in circulation.
Fifth generation
François dit Dupré Piché and Angélique dit Paul Hus
François dit Dupré Piché
Born December 25, 1727 St-Ours sur le Richelieu, Québec
Died: ……………………………
Parents : François dit Dupré Piché and Marie-Françoise Blanchet
Married January 26 1762 St-Ours sur le Richelieu Québec
Angélique dit Paul Hus
Born May 06 1739 Sorel
Died August 20 1814 Saint-Ours, Québec
Parents : Étienne dit Paul Hus and Marie-Urseline Fafard
Children
Angélique Dupré Piché, François Piché, Emmanuel dit Dupré Piché,
Françoise Piché, Marie-Josephte Piché
Other marriage of Angélique Hus says Lemoine Paul with Louis Meunier of Saint-Ours, Québec
The money cards, part two
Livres $ = Pound $ in English
In the early 1700s, the War of the Spanish Succession extended to the French and English colonies in North America. Military spending rose continuously and the growth in the supply of card money far outstripped that of the colonial budget. In 1705, the French Crown refused to redeem all of the card money presented to it, which amounted to a devaluation. The colonial authorities responded by creating more. Inflation was running rampant and the colonial economy was in disarray. In 1714, the Crown decided to get rid of this system and to buy back the cards at half their face value.
For some years, the monetary situation reverted to what it had been before 1685. Various attempts were made to provide the colony with a stable currency, which only ended up creating more confusion. In 1729, a new issue of card money was made. By this time however, it wasn't the only form of paper money, nor the most important. The government started issuing promissory notes, which were redeemable by a bill of exchange on the Naval Treasury, in outlying regions where currency and even card money was in short supply. Unlike card money, they could be issued by any number of military officers and control of their supply lay beyond both the intendant and the metropolitan government. The inflation thus created amounted to a tax to finance military expenditures. (Robert Armstrong)
The situation deteriorated until the fall of Quebec City and Montreal in 1759 and 1760, which brought about the final end of the French regime. The war years were marked by economic breakdown and something close to hyperinflation. During the peace negotiations, France agreed to convert card money and Treasury paper into interest-earning debentures, with discounts ranging from 50 to 80 per cent. However, with the French government essentially bankrupt, these bonds quickly fell to a discount and, by 1771, they were worthless.
A Quebec historian, Gérard Filteau
What is remarkable about the Canadian financial system is that it inaugurates a new kind of money destined to have a great future: the cards are the first banknotes in circulation. Another remarkable fact is that the country has no asset, no monetary reserve to guarantee the value of its paper money. This money is nothing but a representative sign, which gets its value from the honesty of the government and the goodwill of the royal treasury. Such a guarantee, based solely on morality, is insufficient in that it ties the value of money to the good behaviour of a few bureaucrats, and imposes on it fluctuations that depend on the integrity of some men and the vicissitudes of politics.
At the time of the conquest, there were only 70,000 colonists in New France, as opposed to more than a million in the English colonies to the south. Paper money helped to destabilise and slow down the economic and demographic development of New France. It contributed to the downfall of the French empire in North America. Later, it would play a substantial role in the French and America revolutions. Today, unfortunately, it is used the world over and continues to distort economic calculations.
The administration of New France counted on the arrival of cash from France in order to pay civil servants, suppliers, soldiers and clerks. There was confusion if the ship did not arrive until the end of the season, and even more if it did not come at all. In 1685 Intendant Demeulle invented a type of paper money with the purpose of meeting the expenses. He printed various face values on playing cards and affixed his seal to them. When the king's ship arrived, he redeemed this "card money" in cash. This system was brought to an end after 1686, but it was necessary to return to it during the period 1689-1719. In 1714, card money to a value of 2 million livres was in circulation, some cards being worth as much as 100 livres.
The King later returned to using card money in 1729 because the merchants themselves demanded it, this time using white cards without colours, which were cut or had their corners removed according to a fixed table. The whole card was worth 24 livres (which was the highest sum in card money); with the corners cut off, it was worth 12 livres; etc. In the 18th century card money was not the most important form of paper money.
There was the certificat (certificate), a certified sum given to the supplier by the storekeeper. The ordonnance, a promissory note, was signed by the intendant on a printed form, and like cards and certificates, was redeemable by a lettre de change (bill of exchange) on the Naval Treasury. Finally, there was the lettre de change, or traite, used between private citizens to avoid a cash transfer, which the state also used, particularly to redeem paper money. After the Conquest Canadians still held some 16 million livres in paper money, of which only 3.8% was in card money.
Sixth generation
François Piché ou Pichet and Marianne Bibeau
François Piché ou Pichet
Born November 14, 1762 St-Ours
Died :……………………….
Parents : François dit Dupré Piché and Angélique dit Paul Hus
Married June 02 1783 Sorel, Richelieu, Québec
Marie-Anne Bibeau
Born June 02, 1764 Sorel
Died …………………………
Parents : Antoine Bibeau and Marie Céleste Sylvestre
Children
François Pichet, Josephte Pichet, Marie Marguerite Pichet, 
Louis Pichet, Jean-Baptiste Pichet
St-Louis-sur-le -Richelieu
Peasants under Louis XIV
Because what strikes me in the attitude of the peasants, that is their dignity and resignation. The majority seems to look us in the eye enough to cause me to be evil: how should you approach them with the same simplicity of heart that they offer us?
Once the negotiated marriage to the father of the bride, it is a notary to sign a contract in due form. Therefore, the groom is allowed to make his court, assisted to the bathroom of the girl, giving her arm when walking. To avoid the tendency to consider the period of engagement as a marriage "trial" and avoid licentious cohabitation, the Church closer to that ceremony of marriage to make it mandatory to get engaged the day before when the same day the nuptial blessing.
Bridal nightgown
On the wedding night after feasting, dancing and games, heated guests accompany the newlyweds into their room. They were fought in providing water in the fat jokes. Only after having obtained the garter of the bride and groom and saw the couple in bed, friends and families leave the room. The next morning, the bride receives in full uniform in bed.
Sterility between anguish and shame
The absence of children in the context of marriage is a major concern for women. This endangers the estate not only goods but also the values they fool charge to transmit. Typically, the first child born in the year of the union. Where this is not the case, one wonders. Infertility is considered a woman's problem. It shows the finger, it's fun, they are treated as "gypsies" insult that characterizes animals sterile females.
Divorce does not allule the sacred bonds of marriage
Whatever the reasons, a wife can not leave the home for fear of being deprived of all his rights. The trial separation often reflect the husband's brutality. But the civil and ecclesiastical courts make it a cause of separation that conditions for people, nobles.
Because what strikes me in the attitude of the peasants, that is their dignity and resignation. The majority seems to look us in the eye enough to cause me to be evil: how should you approach them with the same simplicity of heart that they offer us?
Once the negotiated marriage to the father of the bride, it is a notary to sign a contract in due form. Therefore, the groom is allowed to make his court, assisted to the bathroom of the girl, giving her arm when walking. To avoid the tendency to consider the period of engagement as a marriage "trial" and avoid licentious cohabitation, the Church closer to that ceremony of marriage to make it mandatory to get engaged the day before when the same day the nuptial blessing.
Bridal nightgownOn the wedding night after feasting, dancing and games, heated guests accompany the newlyweds into their room. They were fought in providing water in the fat jokes. Only after having obtained the garter of the bride and groom and saw the couple in bed, friends and families leave the room. The next morning, the bride receives in full uniform in bed.
Sterility between anguish and shame
The absence of children in the context of marriage is a major concern for women. This endangers the estate not only goods but also the values they fool charge to transmit. Typically, the first child born in the year of the union. Where this is not the case, one wonders. Infertility is considered a woman's problem. It shows the finger, it's fun, they are treated as "gypsies" insult that characterizes animals sterile females.
Divorce does not allule the sacred bonds of marriage
Whatever the reasons, a wife can not leave the home for fear of being deprived of all his rights. The trial separation often reflect the husband's brutality. But the civil and ecclesiastical courts make it a cause of separation that conditions for people, nobles.
Caught in the act of adultery, a wife may the shackles, the pillory or banishment lost her dowry in favor of the husband, if he did not do just murdered, since it is not liable to any in this case. As for the husband, a lawyer does not he wrote in 1670 that his adultery "is punished in the person of the woman and not the husband's.
It remains to women of the people the opportunity to "non-use" of marriage. Indeed, in this case, the separation of the body may be imposed. Still have to prove it .... The test of "congress", which serves to prove the impotence has mostly practiced: it forced the husband to show his manhood before witnesses. Anyway, it is good that separated women retire to a convent. To get married again, you have a cancellation of the Church.
Correct your wife
If you can correct a speech honestly
Your wife's mind, quarrelsome and surly:
If it does nothing to soften her head,
Or take hammer and fight, or goes to scourged.
It remains to women of the people the opportunity to "non-use" of marriage. Indeed, in this case, the separation of the body may be imposed. Still have to prove it .... The test of "congress", which serves to prove the impotence has mostly practiced: it forced the husband to show his manhood before witnesses. Anyway, it is good that separated women retire to a convent. To get married again, you have a cancellation of the Church.
Correct your wife
If you can correct a speech honestly
Your wife's mind, quarrelsome and surly:
If it does nothing to soften her head,
Or take hammer and fight, or goes to scourged.
If you can correct by honest speech
Your wife with quarrelsome spirit and surly
If it does nothing to change his mind
We take the baton and you beat her
Your wife with quarrelsome spirit and surly
If it does nothing to change his mind
We take the baton and you beat her
If the woman could not have children in Alsace, for example, a cherry shake up all the fruits fall provides a child before the end of the year.
To pass to beat women choose to come to New France, that is to say in Quebec. She became "Daughter of the King" «Filles du ROY» to get married in Canada.
Seventh generation
François dit Dupré Pichet 682654 et Marie Louise Bardier Sansoucy 682653
François dit Dupré Pichet 682654
Born July 04 1796 St-Ours
Die around 1830
Parents: François Piche and Marianne Bibeau
Married: February 02, 1824 Sorel, Québec
Marie Louise Bardier Sancousy 682653
Born January 03 1803 St-Ours
Died around 1855
Parents: Antoine Sansoucy and Marguerite Lataille
Child
Pierre Pichet, Henriette Pichet
Heighth Generation
Pierre Piché and Sarah King
Pierre Piché
Born around 1817
Died around 1875
Parents: François dit Dupré Piché et Marie Louise Sansoucy
Marriage: October 12 Hampshire, CT
Sarah King
Born about 1843 Killingly, Windham CT
Born ……………………….
Parents: ……………………..
Child
John Pechie
Ninth generation
John Pechie and Mary Jeanne Gravel
John Pechie
Born July 21 1872 Windham CT
Died March 13 1938 Worcester Mass
Parents: Pierre Piché and Sarah King
Married April 30 1894 Windham, CT
Mary Jeanne Gravel
Born January 12, 1874 Dayville, CT
Died January 11, 1942 Dayville, CT
Parents …………………………………..
Child
Louis Xavier Pechie
Tenth generation
Louis-Xavier Pechie and Sylvia-Alice Dragon
Louis Xavier Pechie ou Piché
Born July 18, 1907 Dayville, CT
Domicile in 1930 Killingly, Windham, CT
Died October, 1985 Windham CT
SSN: 045-05-5036
Profession: factory work Thread manufacturing
Parents: John Pechie and Mary J Pichie
Married: March 1942 Dayville, CT.
Sylvia-Alice Dragon
Born: September 01, 1920 Dayville
Died: June 11, 2001 Dayville, Windham County, CT
Parents: Wilfred Dragon and Clarinda Viens
Children
Maureen Pichie, Bill Pichie
Eleventh generation
Maureen Francis Pichie and Renaud Laprise
Maureen Pechie
Born October 17, 1944 Dayville, CT
Died: March 07, 2007 East Hartford
Parents: Louis-Xavier Pechie and Sylvia-Alice Dragon
Married December 12 1964 Willimantic, CT
Renaud Laprise
Born: June 10, 1939 Sainte-Cécile, Québec
Die:…………………….
Parents: Émile Laprise and Irène Mercier
Children
Lu-Ann Laprise, Real Laprise, Steve Laprise
No comments:
Post a Comment